↓ Skip to main content

Sustainable Nanotechnology: Opportunities and Challenges for Theoretical/Computational Studies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physical Chemistry B, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sustainable Nanotechnology: Opportunities and Challenges for Theoretical/Computational Studies
Published in
Journal of Physical Chemistry B, July 2016
DOI 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b03976
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To help design the next generation of nanomaterials that are functional and have minimal health and safety concerns, it is imperative to establish causality, rather than correlations, in how properties of nanomaterials determine biological and environmental outcomes. Considering the vast design space available and the complexity of nano/bio interfaces, theoretical and computational studies are expected to play a major role in this context. In this minireview, we highlight opportunities and pressing challenges for theoretical and computational chemistry approaches to explore the relevant physicochemical processes that span broad length and time scales. We focus discussions on a bottom-up framework that relies on the determination of correct intermolecular forces, accurate molecular dynamics and coarse-graining procedures to systematically bridge the scales, although top-down approaches are also effective in providing insights for many problems such as the effects of nanoparticles on biological membranes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 97 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 23%
Researcher 18 18%
Professor 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 35 35%
Physics and Astronomy 10 10%
Engineering 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Materials Science 5 5%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 27 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,441,746
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physical Chemistry B
#744
of 17,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,915
of 335,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physical Chemistry B
#11
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,741 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.