↓ Skip to main content

Circadian Typology: A Comprehensive Review

Overview of attention for article published in Chronobiology International: The Journal of Biological & Medical Rhythm Research, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 1,696)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
34 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
4 Redditors
video
2 YouTube creators
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
1179 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Circadian Typology: A Comprehensive Review
Published in
Chronobiology International: The Journal of Biological & Medical Rhythm Research, September 2012
DOI 10.3109/07420528.2012.719971
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 1163 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 139 12%
Student > Master 137 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 115 10%
Researcher 84 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 64 5%
Other 164 14%
Unknown 476 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 172 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 136 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76 6%
Neuroscience 55 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 4%
Other 191 16%
Unknown 507 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 291. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2026.
All research outputs
#152,271
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Chronobiology International: The Journal of Biological & Medical Rhythm Research
#28
of 1,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#594
of 227,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chronobiology International: The Journal of Biological & Medical Rhythm Research
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.