↓ Skip to main content

岐阜県植物誌で用いたキタウラジロチチコグサとミナミウラジロチチコグサ(キク科チチコグサモドキ属)

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Phytogeography and Taxonomy, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
岐阜県植物誌で用いたキタウラジロチチコグサとミナミウラジロチチコグサ(キク科チチコグサモドキ属)
Published in
The Journal of Phytogeography and Taxonomy, December 2020
DOI 10.18942/chiribunrui.0682-04
Authors

髙橋弘 弘

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#4,322,560
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Phytogeography and Taxonomy
#7
of 52 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,845
of 526,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Phytogeography and Taxonomy
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 526,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.