↓ Skip to main content

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Radiation-Induced Cystitis and Proctitis

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Radiation-Induced Cystitis and Proctitis
Published in
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, March 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.12.056
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To provide a retrospective analysis of the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) for treating hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) and proctitis secondary to pelvic- and prostate-only radiotherapy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 60 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Postgraduate 9 14%
Other 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2016.
All research outputs
#21,424,783
of 34,517,289 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#11,003
of 15,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,538
of 209,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#109
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,517,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.