| Title |
Antisemitic conspiracy fantasy in the age of digital media: Three ‘conspiracy theorists’ and their YouTube audiences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Language and Literature, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0963947020971997 |
| Authors |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 26 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 6% |
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Comoros | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 73 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
| Scientists | 3 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 19 | 29% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 5% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 31 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2026.
All research outputs
#657,452
of 34,327,810 outputs
Outputs from Language and Literature
#2
of 295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,167
of 569,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Language and Literature
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,327,810 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 295 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 569,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them