↓ Skip to main content

Potassium channels in articular chondrocytes

Overview of attention for article published in Channels, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Potassium channels in articular chondrocytes
Published in
Channels, October 2014
DOI 10.4161/chan.22340
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Chondrocytes are the resident cells of cartilage, which synthesize and maintain the extracellular matrix. The range of known potassium channels expressed by these unique cells is continually increasing. Since chondrocytes are non-excitable, and do not need to be repolarized following action potentials, the function of potassium channels in these cells has, until recently, remained completely unknown. However, recent advances in both traditional physiology and "omic" technologies have enhanced our knowledge and understanding of the chondrocyte channelome. A large number of potassium channels have been identified and a number of putative, but credible, functions have been proposed. Members of each of the potassium channel sub-families (calcium activated, inward rectifier, voltage-gated and tandem pore) have all been identified. Mechanotransduction, cell volume regulation, apoptosis and chondrogenesis all appear to involve potassium channels. Since evidence suggests that potassium channel gene transcription is altered in osteoarthritis, future studies are needed that investigate potassium channels as potential cellular biomarkers and therapeutic targets for treatment of degenerative joint conditions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
France 1 2%
Unknown 60 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 13 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 14%
Engineering 8 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 15 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#12,146,377
of 34,089,221 outputs
Outputs from Channels
#143
of 468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,332
of 305,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Channels
#48
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,089,221 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 468 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.