↓ Skip to main content

Induced Cross-Modal Synaesthetic Experience Without Abnormal Neuronal Connections

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Science, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
6 X users
patent
2 patents
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
4 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Induced Cross-Modal Synaesthetic Experience Without Abnormal Neuronal Connections
Published in
Psychological Science, February 2009
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02286.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Are the kinds of abnormal cross-modal interactions seen in synaesthesia or following brain damage due to hyperconnectivity between or within brain areas, or are they a result of lack of inhibition? This question is highly contested. Here we show that posthypnotic suggestion induces abnormal cross-modal experience similar to that observed in congenital grapheme-color synaesthesia. Given the short time frame of the experiment, it is unlikely that new cortical connections were established, so we conclude that synaesthesia can result from disinhibition between brain areas.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 11 5%
Germany 7 3%
United States 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Slovakia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 205 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 19%
Student > Master 40 17%
Student > Bachelor 33 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 7%
Other 44 19%
Unknown 24 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 122 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 6%
Neuroscience 14 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 40 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,087,552
of 34,307,719 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Science
#1,544
of 4,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,635
of 251,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Science
#16
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,307,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 86.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.