You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
療養型病棟における黒胡椒を用いた誤嚥性肺炎予防
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nihon Kikan Shokudoka Gakkai Kaiho, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2468/jbes.69.13 |
| Authors |
山口 学, 本多 英俊, 本多 俊伯, 池田 徳彦 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 5 | 24% |
| Unknown | 16 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 95% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,499,243
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Kikan Shokudoka Gakkai Kaiho
#2
of 31 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,557
of 345,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Kikan Shokudoka Gakkai Kaiho
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one scored the same or higher as 29 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them