↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
video
1 YouTube creator
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Reticular Pseudodrusen Characteristics and Associations in the Carotenoids in Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (CAREDS2), an Ancillary Study of the Women’s Health Initiative
Published in
Ophthalmology Retina, December 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.oret.2020.12.019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Spencer C. Cleland, Amitha Domalpally, Zhe Liu, Jeong W. Pak, Barbara A. Blodi, Steven Bailey, Karen Gehrs, Robert Wallace, Lesley Tinker, Julie A. Mares, Julie Mares, Barbara Blodi, Yao Liu, Amitha Domalpally, Corinne Engelman, Ronald Gangnon, Gloria Sarto, Steven Bailey, Erin LeBlanc, Karen Gehrs, Robert Wallace, Jennifer Robinson, Lesley Tinker, D. Max Snodderly, Randy Hammond, Amy Millen, Elizabeth Johnson, Bill Wooten, Jennifer Maykoski, Ann Lundquist, Chris Smith, Kim Wood, Jennie Perry-Raymond, Heather Stockman, Jean Walshire, Christine Sinkey, Thomas Lawler, Courtney Blomme, Kim Wood, Kristen Hall, Diane Pauk, Sherri Alexander, Esther Mezhibovsky, Krista Christensen, Marine Nalbandyan

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Unspecified 1 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 11 61%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Unspecified 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 10 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,155,074
of 32,449,574 outputs
Outputs from Ophthalmology Retina
#67
of 742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,759
of 559,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ophthalmology Retina
#7
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,449,574 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 559,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.