↓ Skip to main content

Association Between Trichomonas vaginalis and Vaginal Bacterial Community Composition Among Reproductive-Age Women

Overview of attention for article published in Sexually Transmitted Diseases, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Association Between Trichomonas vaginalis and Vaginal Bacterial Community Composition Among Reproductive-Age Women
Published in
Sexually Transmitted Diseases, October 2012
DOI 10.1097/olq.0b013e3182631c79
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Some vaginal bacterial communities are thought to prevent infection by sexually transmitted organisms. Prior work demonstrated that the vaginal microbiota of reproductive-age women cluster into 5 types of bacterial communities; 4 dominated by Lactobacillus species (L. iners, L. crispatus, L. gasseri, L. jensenii) and 1 (termed community state type (CST) IV) lacking significant numbers of lactobacilli and characterized by higher proportions of Atopobium, Prevotella, Parvimonas, Sneathia, Gardnerella, Mobiluncus, and other taxa. We sought to evaluate the relationship between vaginal bacterial composition and Trichomonas vaginalis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Madagascar 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 181 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 14%
Student > Master 25 13%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 38 20%
Unknown 45 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 23 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 50 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Sexually Transmitted Diseases
#1,049
of 2,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,995
of 190,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sexually Transmitted Diseases
#15
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.