↓ Skip to main content

Quantification and analysis of ecdysis in the hornworm, Manduca sexta, using machine vision–based tracking

Overview of attention for article published in Invertebrate Neuroscience, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Quantification and analysis of ecdysis in the hornworm, Manduca sexta, using machine vision–based tracking
Published in
Invertebrate Neuroscience, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10158-012-0142-9
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We have developed a machine vision-based method for automatically tracking deformations in the body wall to monitor ecdysis behaviors in the hornworm, Manduca sexta. The method utilizes naturally occurring features on the animal's body (spiracles) and is highly accurate (>95 % success in tracking). Moreover, it is robust to unanticipated changes in the animal's position and in lighting, and in the event tracking of specific features is lost, tracking can be reestablished within a few cycles without input from the user. We have paired our tracking technique with electromyography and have also compared our in vivo results to fictive motor patterns recorded from isolated nerve cords. We found no major difference in the cycle periods of contractions during naturally occurring ecdysis compared to ecdysis initiated prematurely through injection of the peptide ecdysis-triggering hormone, and we confirmed that the ecdysis period in vivo is statistically similar to that of the fictive motor pattern.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Librarian 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 3 23%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 54%
Psychology 1 8%
Neuroscience 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2013.
All research outputs
#29,058,453
of 32,106,825 outputs
Outputs from Invertebrate Neuroscience
#82
of 101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,266
of 217,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Invertebrate Neuroscience
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,106,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.