↓ Skip to main content

Contemporary public perceptions of nursing: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the international research evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nursing Management, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
23 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Contemporary public perceptions of nursing: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the international research evidence
Published in
Journal of Nursing Management, July 2016
DOI 10.1111/jonm.12413
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To investigate the current public understanding and perceptions of nursing. In recent years, attention to large scale health-care failures has focused considerable concern upon nursing standards. To avoid short-term solutions, and the temptation to see individual failures as representative of the wider profession, it is important to understand contemporary public perceptions of nursing. A systematic review and narrative synthesis of peer reviewed papers from January 2010 to September 2015. Four main themes were identified: (1) media portrayal of nursing as a troubled profession; (2) entertainment value in demeaning nursing; (3) role incongruity - nursing trusted but not respected; and (4) nursing roles remain poorly understood. Although there is evidence of strong public trust, this does not generally appear to be born out of an understanding of nursing work and impact; rather it appears to stem from the respect held for the traditional, more sentimental stereotypes of selfless, hardworking young females. A long-term, strategic solution is required that focuses on public engagement and interaction with the profession in a context wider than personal health/ill-health, and that goes beyond the marketing campaigns seen in the past to address recruitment crises.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 221 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Student > Master 24 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 7%
Researcher 13 6%
Lecturer 12 5%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 96 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 73 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 7%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Psychology 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 100 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,357,228
of 31,859,529 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nursing Management
#63
of 1,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,111
of 324,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nursing Management
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,859,529 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them