↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The tree height estimated by non-power models on volumetric models provides reliable predictions of wood volume: The Amazon species height modelling issue
Published in
Trees Forests and People, December 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.tfp.2020.100028
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 8 23%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 17 49%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 19 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2021.
All research outputs
#28,400,288
of 34,151,039 outputs
Outputs from Trees Forests and People
#291
of 400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#452,831
of 574,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trees Forests and People
#10
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,151,039 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 400 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 574,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.