↓ Skip to main content

Books: The Diet Myth: The Real Science Behind What We Eat: Cherish Your Germs

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Books: The Diet Myth: The Real Science Behind What We Eat: Cherish Your Germs
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, June 2016
DOI 10.3399/bjgp16x685981
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stuart Handysides

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 5 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#16,132,416
of 25,500,206 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#3,608
of 4,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,062
of 367,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#61
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,500,206 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.