↓ Skip to main content

糖質過剰摂取により低カリウム血症性周期性四肢麻痺を発症した境界型糖尿病の1例

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Naika Gakkai zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
糖質過剰摂取により低カリウム血症性周期性四肢麻痺を発症した境界型糖尿病の1例
Published in
Nihon Naika Gakkai zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine, November 2020
DOI 10.2169/naika.108.2333
Authors

Eriko Hatayama, Yasumori Izumi, Ayaka Sakoh, Tohru Michitsuji, Yuichi Torisu, Takahiro Mori, Hideki Mori, Tadayoshi Ohno

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#15,094,202
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Naika Gakkai zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
#395
of 749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,430
of 436,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Naika Gakkai zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 749 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.