↓ Skip to main content

Measuring Retention in HIV Care

Overview of attention for article published in JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Measuring Retention in HIV Care
Published in
JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, December 2012
DOI 10.1097/qai.0b013e318273762f
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Measuring retention in HIV primary care is complex, as care includes multiple visits scheduled at varying intervals over time. We evaluated 6 commonly used retention measures in predicting viral load (VL) suppression and the correlation among measures.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 169 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 18%
Student > Master 31 18%
Researcher 28 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 36 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 10%
Social Sciences 16 9%
Psychology 11 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 3%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 43 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,259,995
of 34,640,154 outputs
Outputs from JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
#1,540
of 6,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,530
of 349,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
#13
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,640,154 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.