↓ Skip to main content

Teaching Without Harm: The Ethics of Performing Posthumous Procedures on the Newly Deceased

Overview of attention for article published in Cureus Journal of Medical Science, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Teaching Without Harm: The Ethics of Performing Posthumous Procedures on the Newly Deceased
Published in
Cureus Journal of Medical Science, December 2020
DOI 10.7759/cureus.11855
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 4 14%
Student > Master 2 7%
Lecturer 1 3%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 17 59%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2021.
All research outputs
#27,759,159
of 34,404,538 outputs
Outputs from Cureus Journal of Medical Science
#24,451
of 38,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#431,906
of 569,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cureus Journal of Medical Science
#568
of 832 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,404,538 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38,449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 569,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 832 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.