↓ Skip to main content

Predictors of time to initiation of symptomatic therapy in early Parkinson's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Predictors of time to initiation of symptomatic therapy in early Parkinson's disease
Published in
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, May 2016
DOI 10.1002/acn3.317
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To determine clinical and biological variables that predict time to initiation of symptomatic therapy in de novo Parkinson's disease patients. Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative is a longitudinal case-control study of de novo, untreated Parkinson's disease participants at enrolment. Participants contribute a wide range of motor and non-motor measures, including biofluids and imaging biomarkers. The machine learning method of random survival forests was used to examine the ability of baseline variables to predict time to initiation of symptomatic therapy since study enrollment (baseline). There were 423 PD participants enrolled in PPMI and 33 initial baseline variables. Cross-validation results showed that the three-predictor subset of disease duration (time from diagnosis to enrollment), the modified Schwab and England activities of daily living scale, and the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) total score modestly predicted time to initiation of symptomatic therapy (C = 0.70, pseudo-R (2) = 0.13). Prediction using the three variables was similar to using the entire set of 33. None of the biological variables increased accuracy of the prediction. A prognostic index for time to initiation of symptomatic therapy was created using the linear and nonlinear effects of the three top variables based on a post hoc Cox model. Our findings using a novel machine learning method support previously reported clinical variables that predict time to initiation of symptomatic therapy. However, the inclusion of biological variables did not increase prediction accuracy. Our prognostic index constructed, based on the group-level survival curve can provide an indication of the risk of initiation of ST for PD patients based on functions of the three top predictors.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Professor 5 7%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 18 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 16%
Neuroscience 8 11%
Psychology 7 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 28 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2016.
All research outputs
#4,836,328
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
#606
of 1,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,850
of 342,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
#8
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,461 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.