↓ Skip to main content

Marker species for identifying urban groundwater recharge sources: A review and case study in Nottingham, UK

Overview of attention for article published in Water Research, October 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Marker species for identifying urban groundwater recharge sources: A review and case study in Nottingham, UK
Published in
Water Research, October 1999
DOI 10.1016/s0043-1354(99)00021-4
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 153 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 20%
Researcher 32 20%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 8 5%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 39 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 40 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 38 24%
Engineering 14 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Design 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 47 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2008.
All research outputs
#9,515,460
of 27,778,980 outputs
Outputs from Water Research
#3,734
of 12,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,914
of 40,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Research
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,778,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.