↓ Skip to main content

Motor Planning in Chronic Upper-Limb Hemiparesis: Evidence from Movement-Related Potentials

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Motor Planning in Chronic Upper-Limb Hemiparesis: Evidence from Movement-Related Potentials
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0044558
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Chronic hemiplegia is a common long-term consequence of stroke, and subsequent motor recovery is often incomplete. Neurophysiological studies have focused on motor execution deficits in relatively high functioning patients. Much less is known about the influence exerted by processes related to motor preparation, particularly in patients with poor motor recovery.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 80 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Master 6 7%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 19 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 19%
Neuroscience 8 9%
Engineering 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 22 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2012.
All research outputs
#24,948,912
of 34,622,316 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#158,120
of 225,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,140
of 229,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,443
of 4,802 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,622,316 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,802 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.