↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
35 X users
facebook
12 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
453 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Application of DSM-5 Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder to Three Samples of Children With DSM-IV Diagnoses of Pervasive Developmental Disorders
Published in
American Journal of Psychiatry, October 2012
DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12020276
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Substantial revisions to the DSM-IV criteria for autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) have been proposed in efforts to increase diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. This study evaluated the proposed DSM-5 criteria for the single diagnostic category of autism spectrum disorder in children with DSM-IV diagnoses of pervasive developmental disorders (PDDs) and non-PDD diagnoses.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 453 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 430 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 71 16%
Student > Master 66 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 13%
Researcher 45 10%
Student > Postgraduate 36 8%
Other 73 16%
Unknown 103 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 148 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 62 14%
Social Sciences 34 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 4%
Neuroscience 17 4%
Other 56 12%
Unknown 119 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2026.
All research outputs
#449,327
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Psychiatry
#393
of 9,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,137
of 225,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Psychiatry
#3
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.