↓ Skip to main content

Staggered boards, unequal voting rights, poison pills and innovation intensity: New evidence from the Asian markets

Overview of attention for article published in International Review of Law & Economics, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Staggered boards, unequal voting rights, poison pills and innovation intensity: New evidence from the Asian markets
Published in
International Review of Law & Economics, March 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.irle.2020.105970
Authors

William Mbanyele

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 11 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 6 27%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 27%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 9 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2021.
All research outputs
#17,302,400
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from International Review of Law & Economics
#269
of 337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,551
of 451,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Review of Law & Economics
#14
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.