| Title |
Preliminary optimisation of a simplified sample preparation method to permit direct detection of SARS-CoV-2 within saliva samples using reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Virological Methods, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.114048 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma L A Howson, Stephen P Kidd, Bryony Armson, Alice Goring, Jason Sawyer, Claire Cassar, David Cross, Tom Lewis, Jess Hockey, Samantha Rivers, Saira Cawthraw, Ashley Banyard, Paul Anderson, Sabah Rahou, Michael Andreou, Nick Morant, Duncan Clark, Charlotte Walsh, Shailen Laxman, Rebecca Houghton, Joanne Slater-Jefferies, Paula Costello, Ian Brown, Nicholas Cortes, Keith M Godfrey, Veronica L Fowler |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 128 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 18% |
| Unknown | 35 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 18% |
| Unknown | 37 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2026.
All research outputs
#4,291,658
of 32,542,958 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Virological Methods
#260
of 3,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,720
of 561,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Virological Methods
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,542,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 561,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.