↓ Skip to main content

Skin-fixed scapula trackers: A comparison of two dynamic methods across a range of calibration positions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomechanics, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Skin-fixed scapula trackers: A comparison of two dynamic methods across a range of calibration positions
Published in
Journal of Biomechanics, June 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.05.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Malaysia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 87 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 22%
Student > Master 17 18%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 4 4%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 22 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 32 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Sports and Recreations 8 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 27 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomechanics
#2,181
of 5,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,375
of 125,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomechanics
#9
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.