↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy: Substudy of a Randomized Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine (Online), July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Prognostic Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy: Substudy of a Randomized Trial
Published in
Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine (Online), July 2012
DOI 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.284
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To investigate the effects of hypothermia treatment on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) patterns of brain injury in newborns with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy compared with normothermia, including the prognostic utility of MRI for death and/or disability at a postnatal age of 2 years.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Unknown 160 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 15%
Student > Master 21 13%
Other 20 12%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 42 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 46%
Neuroscience 11 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Psychology 5 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 52 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2015.
All research outputs
#22,344,094
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine (Online)
#1,920
of 2,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,866
of 211,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine (Online)
#30
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.