↓ Skip to main content

Best Practices for Scientific Computing

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Biology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 7,797)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
4228 Mendeley
citeulike
55 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,278 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4,228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 161 4%
United Kingdom 70 2%
Germany 52 1%
France 24 <1%
Spain 23 <1%
Canada 19 <1%
Brazil 18 <1%
Switzerland 14 <1%
Sweden 13 <1%
Other 160 4%
Unknown 3674 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1219 29%
Researcher 1017 24%
Student > Master 482 11%
Student > Bachelor 246 6%
Other 213 5%
Other 651 15%
Unknown 400 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 929 22%
Computer Science 416 10%
Engineering 407 10%
Physics and Astronomy 376 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 251 6%
Other 1297 31%
Unknown 552 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1210. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2026.
All research outputs
#14,378
of 34,360,257 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#37
of 7,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69
of 371,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#1
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.