↓ Skip to main content

Massachusetts Justice Community Opioid Innovation Network (MassJCOIN)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Massachusetts Justice Community Opioid Innovation Network (MassJCOIN)
Published in
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, January 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108275
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth A. Evans, Thomas J. Stopka, Ekaterina Pivovarova, Sean M. Murphy, Faye S. Taxman, Warren J. Ferguson, Dana Bernson, Claudia Santelices, Kathryn E. McCollister, Randall Hoskinson, Thomas Lincoln, Peter D. Friedmann, MassJCOIN Research Group, Kevin F. Coppinger, Jason Faro, Christopher J. Donelan, Edmond Hayes, Nicholas Cocchi, Martha Lyman, Thomas Lincoln, Patrick J. Cahillane, Melinda Cady, Peter J. Koutoujian, Kashif Siddiqi, Dan Lee, Jerome P. McDermott, Tara Flynn, Erika Sica, Steven W. Tompkins, Rachelle Steinberg, Marjorie Bernadeau-Alexandre

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 100 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Student > Master 6 6%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 47 47%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 51 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2026.
All research outputs
#3,929,264
of 32,956,775 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
#467
of 2,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,791
of 562,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
#20
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,956,775 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 562,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.