↓ Skip to main content

Glutathione S-transferase A1, M1, P1 and T1 null or low-activity genotypes are associated with enhanced oxidative damage among haemodialysis patients

Overview of attention for article published in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Glutathione S-transferase A1, M1, P1 and T1 null or low-activity genotypes are associated with enhanced oxidative damage among haemodialysis patients
Published in
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, October 2012
DOI 10.1093/ndt/gfs369
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sonja Suvakov, Tatjana Damjanovic, Aleksandra Stefanovic, Tatjana Pekmezovic, Ana Savic-Radojevic, Marija Pljesa-Ercegovac, Marija Matic, Tatjana Djukic, Vesna Coric, Jovana Jakovljevic, Jasmina Ivanisevic, Steva Pljesa, Zorana Jelic-Ivanovic, Jasmina Mimic-Oka, Nada Dimkovic, Tatjana Simic

Abstract

Increased oxidative stress is a hallmark of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Glutathione S-transferases (GST) are involved in the detoxification of xenobiotics and protection of oxidative damage. We hypothesized that genetic polymorphism in antioxidant enzymes GSTA1, GSTM1, GSTP1 and GSTT1 is more frequent in ESRD and modulates the degree of oxidative stress in these patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,415,350
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
#1,261
of 6,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,320
of 191,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
#8
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.