↓ Skip to main content

Per-Attack Reporting of Prodromal Symptoms Concurrent with C1-Inhibitor Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema Attacks

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Therapy, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Per-Attack Reporting of Prodromal Symptoms Concurrent with C1-Inhibitor Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema Attacks
Published in
Advances in Therapy, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12325-012-0053-5
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Prodromal symptoms commonly precede hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks. There is continuing interest in evaluating prodromes as treatment indicators, but a paucity of relevant data. This study was designed to prospectively identify prodomal characteristics in patients voluntarily reporting such information around the time of seeking treatment for an acute HAE attack.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Turkey 1 4%
Spain 1 4%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 10 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Unknown 10 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2026.
All research outputs
#2,802,548
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Therapy
#320
of 3,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,973
of 229,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Therapy
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.