You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Damage and recovery assessment of the Philippines' mangroves following Super Typhoon Haiyan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Pollution Bulletin, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.080 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jordan Long, Chandra Giri, Jurgenne Primavera, Mandar Trivedi |
| Abstract |
We quantified mangrove disturbance resulting from Super Typhoon Haiyan using a remote sensing approach. Mangrove areas were mapped prior to Haiyan using 30m Landsat imagery and a supervised decision-tree classification. A time sequence of 250m eMODIS data was used to monitor mangrove condition prior to, and following, Haiyan. Based on differences in eMODIS NDVI observations before and after the storm, we classified mangrove into three damage level categories: minimal, moderate, or severe. Mangrove damage in terms of extent and severity was greatest where Haiyan first made landfall on Eastern Samar and Western Samar provinces and lessened westward corresponding with decreasing storm intensity as Haiyan tracked from east to west across the Visayas region of the Philippines. However, within 18months following Haiyan, mangrove areas classified as severely, moderately, and minimally damaged decreased by 90%, 81%, and 57%, respectively, indicating mangroves resilience to powerful typhoons. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 17% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Nicaragua | 1 | 6% |
| Singapore | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 78% |
| Scientists | 4 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 231 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 40 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 12% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 59 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 73 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 6% |
| Engineering | 11 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 64 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2018.
All research outputs
#2,622,130
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Marine Pollution Bulletin
#986
of 9,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,793
of 377,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Pollution Bulletin
#18
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.