↓ Skip to main content

dFOXO Activates Large and Small Heat Shock Protein Genes in Response to Oxidative Stress to Maintain Proteostasis in Drosophila *

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Chemistry, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
dFOXO Activates Large and Small Heat Shock Protein Genes in Response to Oxidative Stress to Maintain Proteostasis in Drosophila *
Published in
Journal of Biological Chemistry, July 2016
DOI 10.1074/jbc.m116.723049
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Maintaining protein homeostasis is critical for survival at the cellular and organismal level. Cells express a family of molecular chaperones, the heat shock proteins, during times of oxidative stress to protect against proteotoxicity. We have identified a second stress responsive transcription factor, dFOXO, that works alongside the heat shock transcription factor (HSF) to activate transcription of both the small heat shock protein and the large heat shock protein genes. This expression likely protects cells from protein misfolding associated with oxidative stress. Here we identify the regions of the Hsp70 promoter essential for FOXO-dependent transcription using in vitro methods and find a physiological role for FOXO-dependent expression of heatshock proteins in vivo.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
India 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 64 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Student > Bachelor 11 17%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 20 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2016.
All research outputs
#18,229,641
of 27,293,837 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#77,263
of 87,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,777
of 332,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#245
of 424 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,293,837 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 87,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 424 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.