↓ Skip to main content

Border interceptions of forest insects established in Australia: intercepted invaders travel early and often

Overview of attention for article published in NeoBiota, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Border interceptions of forest insects established in Australia: intercepted invaders travel early and often
Published in
NeoBiota, January 2021
DOI 10.3897/neobiota.64.60424
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Other 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 10 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 29%
Arts and Humanities 2 7%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2021.
All research outputs
#15,798,610
of 27,274,276 outputs
Outputs from NeoBiota
#389
of 605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,885
of 541,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeoBiota
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,274,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 541,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.