↓ Skip to main content

iPS Cells: Mapping the Policy Issues

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
iPS Cells: Mapping the Policy Issues
Published in
Cell, December 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.039
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Given the explosion of research on induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, it is timely to consider the various ethical, legal, and social issues engaged by this fast-moving field. Here, we review issues associated with the procurement, basic research, and clinical translation of iPS cells.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 119 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 25%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Master 10 8%
Professor 7 6%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 14%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 18 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2018.
All research outputs
#3,683,703
of 29,323,180 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#8,392
of 18,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,026
of 197,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#38
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,323,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.