↓ Skip to main content

Breastfeeding and the Affordable Care Act

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric clinics of North America, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 1,572)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Breastfeeding and the Affordable Care Act
Published in
Pediatric clinics of North America, July 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.pcl.2015.05.002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Mothers who receive or qualify for the Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) program or have lower income are less likely to start and continue breastfeeding than their more advantaged counterparts. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires employers to provide break time and space to express breast milk and requires insurance companies to cover breastfeeding support, supplies, and counseling at no cost to mothers. This ACA benefit does not extend to all Medicaid recipients or women in the WIC program. Legislative and regulatory efforts are needed to provide comprehensive coverage for all women and reduce disparities in breastfeeding.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 34 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 36 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 16%
Social Sciences 15 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 40 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2024.
All research outputs
#425,497
of 32,718,554 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric clinics of North America
#18
of 1,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,758
of 295,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric clinics of North America
#1
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,718,554 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.