↓ Skip to main content

The impact of non-traditional activities on the estimation of bank efficiency: International evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Banking & Finance, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The impact of non-traditional activities on the estimation of bank efficiency: International evidence
Published in
Journal of Banking & Finance, July 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.01.006
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Oman 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 197 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 24%
Student > Master 24 12%
Lecturer 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 5%
Other 40 20%
Unknown 53 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 63 31%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 63 31%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 <1%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 62 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,801,525
of 29,690,614 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Banking & Finance
#503
of 2,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,572
of 119,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Banking & Finance
#9
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,690,614 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.