↓ Skip to main content

Can I Retake It? Exploring Subgroup Differences and Criterion-Related Validity in Promotion Retesting

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Psychology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Can I Retake It? Exploring Subgroup Differences and Criterion-Related Validity in Promotion Retesting
Published in
Journal of Applied Psychology, January 2011
DOI 10.1037/a0023562
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 1%
Unknown 85 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 30%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 11%
Student > Master 9 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 10%
Researcher 8 9%
Other 20 23%
Unknown 6 7%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 38 43%
Psychology 28 32%
Social Sciences 9 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Linguistics 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 8 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,168,167
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Psychology
#2,208
of 3,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,142
of 190,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Psychology
#36
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.