↓ Skip to main content

Do Portfolio Distortions Reflect Superior Information or Psychological Biases?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Do Portfolio Distortions Reflect Superior Information or Psychological Biases?
Published in
Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, January 2013
DOI 10.1017/s0022109012000610
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 117 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 30%
Researcher 14 11%
Professor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Student > Master 8 7%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 22 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 52 43%
Business, Management and Accounting 27 22%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Philosophy 1 <1%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 30 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2019.
All research outputs
#12,450,313
of 34,593,328 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis
#429
of 1,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,629
of 347,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,593,328 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.