↓ Skip to main content

Imaging synaptic density in the living human brain

Overview of attention for article published in Science Translational Medicine, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
629 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Imaging synaptic density in the living human brain
Published in
Science Translational Medicine, July 2016
DOI 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf6667
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Chemical synapses are the predominant neuron-to-neuron contact in the central nervous system. Presynaptic boutons of neurons contain hundreds of vesicles filled with neurotransmitters, the diffusible signaling chemicals. Changes in the number of synapses are associated with numerous brain disorders, including Alzheimer's disease and epilepsy. However, all current approaches for measuring synaptic density in humans require brain tissue from autopsy or surgical resection. We report the use of the synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) radioligand [(11)C]UCB-J combined with positron emission tomography (PET) to quantify synaptic density in the living human brain. Validation studies in a baboon confirmed that SV2A is an alternative synaptic density marker to synaptophysin. First-in-human PET studies demonstrated that [(11)C]UCB-J had excellent imaging properties. Finally, we confirmed that PET imaging of SV2A was sensitive to synaptic loss in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Thus, [(11)C]UCB-J PET imaging is a promising approach for in vivo quantification of synaptic density with several potential applications in diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of neurological and psychiatric disorders.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 629 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 613 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 132 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 94 15%
Student > Master 49 8%
Student > Bachelor 45 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 5%
Other 106 17%
Unknown 172 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 133 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 87 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 9%
Psychology 36 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 4%
Other 77 12%
Unknown 212 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 454. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#78,019
of 34,639,378 outputs
Outputs from Science Translational Medicine
#234
of 5,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,339
of 337,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Translational Medicine
#4
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,639,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 91.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.