↓ Skip to main content

Lyssavirus in Indian Flying Foxes, Sri Lanka - Volume 22, Number 8—August 2016 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC

Overview of attention for article published in Emerging Infectious Diseases, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Lyssavirus in Indian Flying Foxes, Sri Lanka - Volume 22, Number 8—August 2016 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC
Published in
Emerging Infectious Diseases, August 2016
DOI 10.3201/eid2208.151986
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A novel lyssavirus was isolated from brains of Indian flying foxes (Pteropus medius) in Sri Lanka. Phylogenetic analysis of complete virus genome sequences, and geographic location and host species, provides strong evidence that this virus is a putative new lyssavirus species, designated as Gannoruwa bat lyssavirus.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
France 1 1%
Cameroon 1 1%
Unknown 91 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 36 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 13 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 41 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,941,119
of 33,738,238 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#2,229
of 10,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,631
of 333,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#34
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,738,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.