↓ Skip to main content

Poly(α‐hydroxyacids) for application in the spinal cord: Resorbability and biocompatibility with adult rat Schwann cells and spinal cord

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, December 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
18 patents

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Poly(α‐hydroxyacids) for application in the spinal cord: Resorbability and biocompatibility with adult rat Schwann cells and spinal cord
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, December 1998
DOI 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(19981215)42:4<642::aid-jbm22>3.0.co;2-k
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Researcher 8 18%
Professor 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 10 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 16%
Neuroscience 5 11%
Materials Science 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2017.
All research outputs
#10,953,880
of 31,591,940 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
#730
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,249
of 144,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
#165
of 449 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,591,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 449 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.