↓ Skip to main content

Engineering Functional Rat Ovarian Spheroids Using Granulosa and Theca Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Sciences, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Engineering Functional Rat Ovarian Spheroids Using Granulosa and Theca Cells
Published in
Reproductive Sciences, January 2021
DOI 10.1007/s43032-020-00445-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Myung Jae Jeon, Young Sik Choi, Il Dong Kim, Tracy Criswell, Anthony Atala, James J. Yoo, John D. Jackson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Unknown 6 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Unknown 7 78%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2021.
All research outputs
#18,783,531
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Sciences
#724
of 1,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#378,513
of 505,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Sciences
#37
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.