↓ Skip to main content

Persistent Muscle Inhibition after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Overview of attention for article published in Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Persistent Muscle Inhibition after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Published in
Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, December 2016
DOI 10.1249/mss.0000000000001046
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Persistent voluntary quadriceps activation deficits are common following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), but the direct causes are unclear. The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether spinal reflex excitability deficits are present in individuals with a history of ACLR, and secondarily to determine if spinal reflex excitability predicts which individuals possess full voluntary quadriceps activation. One hundred and forty-seven individuals (74 Healthy and 73 ACLR) participated in this cross-sectional, case-control study. Quadriceps spinal reflex excitability was quantified using the Hoffmann reflex normalized to the maximal muscle response (H:M ratio). Voluntary quadriceps activation was evaluated with the burst superimposition technique and calculated via the central activation ratio (CAR). Separate 2x2 ANCOVAs were used to compare differences between-limbs and between-groups for H:M ratio and CAR. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the accuracy of H:M ratio to predict if ACLR participants present with full voluntary activation (CAR≥0.95). ACLR H:M ratio was not different between limbs or compared to the healthy group (P>0.05). While ACLR CAR was lower bilaterally compared to the healthy group (p<0.001), it did not differ between limbs. H:M ratio has poor accuracy for predicting which individuals exhibit full voluntary activation (ROC area under the curve=0.52, 95% CI=0.37,0.66; odds ratio = 2.2, 95% CI=0.8, 5.9). Spinal reflex excitability did not differ between limbs in individuals with ACLR or compared to healthy participants. The level of quadriceps spinal reflex excitability has poor accuracy at predicting which ACLR individuals would demonstrate full voluntary quadriceps activation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 5 6%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 28 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 18%
Sports and Recreations 11 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Philosophy 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 40 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2016.
All research outputs
#4,508,094
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#2,799
of 8,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,508
of 453,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#44
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.