↓ Skip to main content

Pragmatic randomized controlled trial of an allergy intervention for children aged 6–16 with asthma and rhinitis in general practice

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical & Experimental Allergy, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pragmatic randomized controlled trial of an allergy intervention for children aged 6–16 with asthma and rhinitis in general practice
Published in
Clinical & Experimental Allergy, August 2016
DOI 10.1111/cea.12781
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

It is widely believed that for allergic rhinitis and asthma, avoidance of specific triggers can improve symptom control. Whilst many children with asthma or rhinitis are sensitised to airborne allergens, primary care diagnostic and management decisions are often made without a detailed history of the allergic triggers or allergy testing. Thus, treatment decisions are empirical and allergen avoidance advice is either not given or, if given, not tailored to the child's sensitivities. To ascertain whether allergy assessment and tailored advice in General Practice enhances outcomes of children with asthma and rhinitis. Pragmatic RCT of allergy intervention (structured allergy history, skin prick testing and appropriate allergy avoidance advice) versus usual care in children with asthma and/or rhino-conjunctivitis. A blinded observer assessed outcomes at 12 months. Main outcome measures were symptom scores and disease-specific health-related QoL. Secondary outcomes were health care utilisation, days unable to pursue usual activities, and self-rated improvement. 335 participants were randomised to formal allergy assessment or normal care. There were no differences in participants' demographic or clinical characteristics at baseline (all p>.05). At 12 months, participants receiving the allergy intervention had fewer rhinitis symptoms (MD -3.14, 95% CI -6.01, -0.81) and an improvement in QoL (MD -0.50, 95% CI 0.32, 0.68). There were no significant changes in asthma symptoms, health care utilisation or number of days unable to pursue usual activities. Amongst children with known asthma and/or rhinitis in primary care, taking a structured allergy history with skin prick testing and tailored advice on allergy avoidance resulted in reduced symptoms of rhinitis and improved QoL This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Librarian 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Professor 4 8%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 16 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 20 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2016.
All research outputs
#10,469,513
of 31,712,529 outputs
Outputs from Clinical & Experimental Allergy
#2,402
of 4,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,139
of 325,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical & Experimental Allergy
#20
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,712,529 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.