↓ Skip to main content

Reaping the Benefits of Task Conflict in Teams: The Critical Role of Team Psychological Safety Climate

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Psychology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
reddit
1 Redditor
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
952 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Reaping the Benefits of Task Conflict in Teams: The Critical Role of Team Psychological Safety Climate
Published in
Journal of Applied Psychology, January 2012
DOI 10.1037/a0024200
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Past research suggests that task conflict may improve team performance under certain conditions; however, we know little about these specific conditions. On the basis of prior theory and research on conflict in teams, we argue that a climate of psychological safety is one specific context under which task conflict will improve team performance. Using evidence from 117 project teams, the present research found that psychological safety climate moderates the relationship between task conflict and performance. Specifically, task conflict and team performance were positively associated under conditions of high psychological safety. The results support the conclusion that psychological safety facilitates the performance benefits of task conflict in teams. Theoretical implications and suggestions for future research are discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 952 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 10 1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 923 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 172 18%
Student > Master 165 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 82 9%
Student > Bachelor 65 7%
Researcher 58 6%
Other 134 14%
Unknown 276 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 249 26%
Psychology 206 22%
Social Sciences 77 8%
Engineering 21 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 2%
Other 88 9%
Unknown 293 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2025.
All research outputs
#975,526
of 31,943,232 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Psychology
#329
of 3,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,990
of 287,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Psychology
#6
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,943,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.