↓ Skip to main content

I202 健康的な労働を可能にする要因と社員に求められる産業保健師像 : 社員の視点を通して

Overview of attention for article published in Sangyō eiseigaku zasshi Journal of occupational health, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
I202 健康的な労働を可能にする要因と社員に求められる産業保健師像 : 社員の視点を通して
Published in
Sangyō eiseigaku zasshi Journal of occupational health, January 2005
DOI 10.1539/sangyoeisei.kj00003804183
Authors

野崎 律子, 掛本 知里, 加藤 登紀子, 有吉 浩美

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2021.
All research outputs
#17,636,985
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Sangyō eiseigaku zasshi Journal of occupational health
#184
of 263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,492
of 152,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sangyō eiseigaku zasshi Journal of occupational health
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 263 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.