↓ Skip to main content

アメリカのドイツ占領政策と米英統合占領地区の形成

Overview of attention for article published in Study of Economic History (KEIZAISHI KENKYU), March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
アメリカのドイツ占領政策と米英統合占領地区の形成
Published in
Study of Economic History (KEIZAISHI KENKYU), March 2008
DOI 10.24712/keizaishikenkyu.11.0_142
Authors

河崎 信樹

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,965,383
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Study of Economic History (KEIZAISHI KENKYU)
#3
of 31 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,200
of 95,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Study of Economic History (KEIZAISHI KENKYU)
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one scored the same or higher as 28 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them