↓ Skip to main content

Morphology and composition of Goldeye (Hiodontidae; Hiodon alosoides) otoliths

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Morphology, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Morphology and composition of Goldeye (Hiodontidae; Hiodon alosoides) otoliths
Published in
Journal of Morphology, February 2021
DOI 10.1002/jmor.21324
Pubmed ID
Authors

James M. Long, Richard A. Snow, Brenda M. Pracheil, Bryan C. Chakoumakos

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Master 2 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2021.
All research outputs
#15,665,903
of 23,277,141 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Morphology
#1,211
of 1,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#306,460
of 505,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Morphology
#30
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,277,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.