↓ Skip to main content

The effect of platelet-rich plasma on the regenerative therapy of muscle derived stem cells for articular cartilage repair

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The effect of platelet-rich plasma on the regenerative therapy of muscle derived stem cells for articular cartilage repair
Published in
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, October 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.joca.2012.09.018
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is reported to promote collagen synthesis and cell proliferation as well as enhance cartilage repair. Our previous study revealed that the intracapsular injection of muscle derived stem cells (MDSCs) expressing bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP-4) combined with soluble Flt-1 (sFlt1) was effective for repairing articular cartilage (AC) after osteoarthritis (OA) induction. The current study was undertaken to investigate whether PRP could further enhance the therapeutic effect of MDSC therapy for the OA treatment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 138 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 15%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 31 22%
Unknown 31 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 8%
Engineering 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 33 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2016.
All research outputs
#3,414,665
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
#575
of 3,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,334
of 191,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.