↓ Skip to main content

Does sequence matter? Productive failure and designing online authentic learning for process engineering

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Educational Technology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Does sequence matter? Productive failure and designing online authentic learning for process engineering
Published in
British Journal of Educational Technology, July 2016
DOI 10.1111/bjet.12492
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Researcher 9 10%
Professor 7 7%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 30 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 25 27%
Engineering 6 6%
Psychology 5 5%
Computer Science 4 4%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 38 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2016.
All research outputs
#15,396,683
of 26,845,410 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Educational Technology
#692
of 1,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,977
of 331,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Educational Technology
#15
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,845,410 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,624 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.