↓ Skip to main content

The role of astrocytes in generating circadian rhythmicity in health and disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurochemistry, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The role of astrocytes in generating circadian rhythmicity in health and disease
Published in
Journal of Neurochemistry, March 2021
DOI 10.1111/jnc.15312
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Evidence is accumulating that the mammalian circadian clock system is considerably more complex than previously believed, also in terms of the cell types that actually contribute to generating the oscillation within the master clock, in the suprachiasmatic nuclei of the hypothalamus. Here we review the evidence that has lead to the identification of a bona fide astrocytic circadian clock, and that of the potential contribution of such clock to the generation of circadian and seasonal rhythmicity in health and in neurodegenerative disorders. Finally, we speculate on the role of the astrocytic clock in determining some of the clinical features of hepatic encephalopathy, a reversible neuropsychiatric syndrome associated with advanced liver disease, which is characterised by transient, profound morphological and functional astrocytic abnormalities, in the absence of significant, structural neuronal changes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 26%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 15 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 11 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 15 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2021.
All research outputs
#23,905,228
of 29,139,670 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurochemistry
#7,305
of 8,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#354,984
of 461,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurochemistry
#57
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,139,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.